Comments on: aporia step 3/6

By: echo 20071029

echo 20071029 — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:37:06 +0000

[...] Benefits Realisation [...] The aim of this proposal is to capture lessons being learned through participation within and at the boundaries of the [...] Community arising from Aporia’s participation and pathfinding collaborations across the [...] Uniquely, Aporia’s project Aporia Green has been socially constructed as a project that by nature emerges between other project bids (see APPENDIX B) and, as such, did not itself apply for independent funding under the terms of the [...] Programme call, but rather opted to pursue a service-oriented approach to operating between bids and bidders. This comprises a phenomenological (or ethnomethodological) approach to open community development, and it is this approach that has been actively generating the ongoing lived experiences that are to be reflected upon during the proposed event. The proposed event has been organised as part and parcel of a long-standing international open community of phenomenologists and ethnomethodologists who have been meeting annually for the past 46 years under the auspices of the [...] and its related sister-communities. The annual gathering spans 3-4 generations of practicing phenomenologists including those who founded the original fora, those who have been students of that first generation of community of practice, and now also, those who have arisen out of multiple other academic disciplines and institutional environments who are actively seeking to join the teaching, learning, research, and administrative support endeavours that comprise the growing open community as a whole. In particular, this open community of scholars are being increasingly informed, through their everyday participation in academia across the continents, of the pros and cons of social software use and its development. As such, cross fertilisation of experiences between our concentrated [...] Programme efforts and this particular open community of ongoing teaching/learning/research/support practice comprises a trajectory of benefits realisation that would otherwise be lost to view [...]

By: side door « Blog Archive « WHiSPeRiNG GaLLeRY

side door « Blog Archive « WHiSPeRiNG GaLLeRY — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:30:10 +0000

[...] you have reached the side door [...]

By: Blue Moon SP1

Blue Moon SP1 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:11:16 +0000

Hi [...], In [...]’s absence, and regarding the [...], please accept this email as the go ahead to attend this event [...]

By: echo 20070622

echo 20070622 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:05:05 +0000

[...] Now, here’s a second leg of Aporia’s community boundary spanning initiative – this time at a proposed cost of [...] to Aporia’s individual [...] account, and so at first glance matching in financial terms that which is being received in, i.e. in socioeconomic terms, such pathfinding for social enterprise activity will appear to be generating something for nothing [...] though, importantly, not from nothing [...] and this is the point that I hope we can all leverage on in due course [...]

By: echo 20070615

echo 20070615 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:01:34 +0000

[...] Thank you for your email – great to get this ball rolling: more social enterprise subtleties to follow [...]

By: Blue Moon SP1

Blue Moon SP1 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:59:48 +0000

Hi [...] I have been teaching and marking a lot of papers and had to think for a half a minute about this one [...]

Great idea. I don’t see why this should not be possible. [...]? Any reason? This is one of the advantages of [...] holding the funds outside of a University finance system and accounting by team. I like the idea of having a mechanism to pool funds from disparate sources. Do we need to wonder/worry about audits? If the other project is happy for you to do this, I don’t see why not and the cost is -£[...]

[...] I do think this represents a big e-admin iceberg and is a question worth pursuing. Institutional finance can open a can of mixed metaphors. Do we have any finance officers into Web2.0 and agile accounting to match agile development? [...]

Yes, do it, unless [...] screams no. [...], please see below? [...]

By: echo 20070613

echo 20070613 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:56:40 +0000

[...] minus [...] GBP [...]

By: Blue Moon SP1

Blue Moon SP1 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:55:18 +0000

What funding do you require for your activity

By: echo 20070613

echo 20070613 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:54:25 +0000

[...] By officially invoicing the following person on behalf of myself “for [...] GBP in respect of the time spent contributing to the [...] research community on [...]”
[...] Please note that having discussed this innovation with [...] today, she is expecting to be emailed an invoice from the [...] community on my behalf in the next couple of days [...]

By: Blue Moon SP1

Blue Moon SP1 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:51:27 +0000

How can the [...] Team help you with your activity